Thesis: the average 18 year old student in, say, York in AD 800 (the middle of the so-called "Dark Ages") had read more, knew more languages, was better trained in logic, could read more music, knew more mathematics and astronomy than the average student from a university today.
-
Show this thread
-
Thoughts: 1. I am only comparing students at the end of the Carolingian trivium + quadrivium with students at uni today, NOT how widespread education was/is. 2. I concede their 'mathematics' was limited (arithmetic + geometry; probably projecting my own limited maths onto others
54 replies 7 retweets 118 likesShow this thread -
3. Re 'music'. They had limited notation (probably more than average student today, who doesn't have any). But their real musical prowess was theoretical, understanding the maths of harmonic proportions. 4. Some paupers and girls did go to school. This wasn't only elites.
43 replies 7 retweets 73 likesShow this thread -
Oh, and 6. My thesis does not for a moment imply that our world’s knowledge of these subjects isn’t vastly superior to theirs. I am suggesting - on average - they knew more of these subjects.
78 replies 4 retweets 60 likesShow this thread
Who the fuck cares I'm better at naming Pokémon than any human being alive in 800 CE would've been, does that make me a better person than them or prove some kind of point about their teachers being lazy
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.