Obviously not. Although, it WAS considered the humane way to execute nobility, which says more about historical execution methods than anything else.
-
-
Replying to @loudpenitent @arthur_affect
There was that one episode John Oliver did about the death penalty drug and he had this aside where he explained why all the seemingly "logical" methods of execution are all monstrously awful And it made me realize you could literally just do an entire show about that
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Like I would watch the fuck out of a YouTube series that was just a professional explaining why none of the "humane" ways of killing people that most of us think of are non-monstrous
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @Nymphomachy @loudpenitent
I dunno, leaving aside that "humane execution" is oxymoronic (the worst thing about dying in most people's opinion isn't the pain it's the death) it is basically a solved problem Fastest way to kill someone is a bullet in the head, specifically through the medulla oblongata
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
It's the brain's "CPU", everything else is software loaded into memory No medulla = everything else stops almost instantly No higher brain function, no heartbeat, no breathing
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
You wouldn't even need an actual bullet, you could save money on bullets by using a captive-bolt pistol like they use for livestock That's why the guy uses one in No Country for Old Men, this grim thing where he executes helpless people quickly and with no remorse
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
People do fuck this up in slaughterhouses all the time but that's because they have to kill a ridiculous number of cattle in one day To execute the occasional human this way would be much easier, you could even drug them first
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
There's a lot of perversity involved in why we don't actually do it this way, a lot of it tied up in us not being clear on why we execute people and what the concept of "humane" execution means
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Like one of the ridiculous things about people fighting back and forth over the current lethal injection protocol is they want what sounds like a foolproof means of inducing quick death *without* the use of any "fun" drugs
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
You want someone to drift off to sleep blissfully and never wake up, we have a pretty good idea of how to do that, you give them an OD of an opioid No one can actually know how dying feels, especially dying slowly from a drug, but we can make a good guess
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
Opioids' whole psychotropic function is to make you feel okay with whatever is happening Whatever someone feels when they're dying from a morphine OD, they're probably okay with it, that's morphine's job That's why people get addicted and die of opioids in the first place
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @Nymphomachy
...Which is why those drugs are controversial and tainted and legally controlled substances Which is why getting them approved for a "humane" execution protocol would be this huge bureaucratic nightmare, so they don't do it Instead we got the ridiculous three-drug protocol
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Nymphomachy
One sedative (sodium thiopental) to knock you out, one paralytic (pancuronium bromide) to keep you from struggling, one poison (a massive overdose of potassium chloride) to stop your heart Pharmaceutically this is a Rube Goldberg machine
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.