Would you accept as evidence a comment in which he says, in so many words, "I like eugenics"https://twitter.com/arthur_affect/status/1276075031496253440?s=19 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @blottttto @David_Jorgonson
Enjoying harmful ideas on an *aesthetic* level like they're just a little spice in your stew speaks to a viewpoint from a position of such sheltered privilege it's beneath contempt, tbh
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Scott said something similar about neoreactionaries, "Most of them are totally insane but at least you can tell they've had an original thought at one point in their lives" Yeah sorry us dumb sheeple don't entertain you with our acceptance of received wisdom Scott
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
The appeal to authority or appeal to popularity may be, as we all know, a logical fallacy But its inverse fallacy, an appeal to *novelty*, is just as fallacious and also extremely dangerous, to say nothing of being insufferable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.