and how generous they were with their time/attention/general confidence-boosting conviction that I could be doing meaningful and important things.
-
-
Replying to @KelseyTuoc @zmpster
Isn't this the same thing that made people fall for Elizabeth Holmes? Being overly influenced by personal charisma is a form of gullibility. & Scott Alexander builds a bridge to Nazi or misogynist ideology, recruiting future Eliot Rodgers and Dylan Roof types. Is that OK?
3 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
That's a bit unfair. Guys like Roger and Roof were radicalized in spaces far worse than SSC.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @veronicastraszh @David_Jorgonson and
I have a lot of criticisms about the content of the broader SSC ecosystem and its connections to "race realism." But let's maintain perspective.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
People go from mild to worse - that's how online radicalization works. And SSC's blogroll, links and comment sections are full of those worse spaces. SSC's the first step.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @blottttto @David_Jorgonson
See this is the opposite kind of nonsense. Scott discusses topics other than serotonin. For example, eugenics, biodeterminism, IQ and race, biological gender differences, etcetera. In other words, you're not being honest.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @blottttto @David_Jorgonson
Google it. It's certainly a topic there. You'll have to use wayback machine to find the text.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Arthur Chu Retweeted Arthur Chu
Would you accept as evidence a comment in which he says, in so many words, "I like eugenics"https://twitter.com/arthur_affect/status/1276075031496253440?s=19 …
Arthur Chu added,
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.