This is exactly why people are locked in this fight over "SJWs going too far" "I'm not comfortable with LGBT stuff myself, but I'm willing to intellectually agree that you deserve rights, isn't that good enough for you" Of course not
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @Hari_Narayan_SK and
It's a good *starting point* but if that's an accurate description of where you are what it means is your morals *haven't actually changed* Your verbal *description* of your morals have changed, probably because you emotionally need to maintain friendly relations with me asking
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Hari_Narayan_SK and
But when push comes to shove if you actually have to make a choice you are very likely to crumple Nobody stands up for something based on what they intellectually assent to but emotionally just aren't comfortable with
2 replies 2 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Hari_Narayan_SK and
Part of the radicalization these people call the "Great Awokening" was the sheer exhaustion of the gay marriage fight and the aftermath of Prop 8 The sheer sense of betrayal at HOW MANY Californians who were allies in theory jumped ship the moment they had to commit
2 replies 4 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Hari_Narayan_SK and
That what your actual moral commitments are is a black box from the standpoint of reasoned debate and intellectual inquiry and all that weak shit Very civil, reasonable upper class suburbanites nodding going "I hear and accept your arguments but I'm just voting how I feel"
1 reply 2 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Hari_Narayan_SK and
It's when the shit hits the fan and a change is actually about to occur that you actually find out who you really are When there's riots in the streets and you find out whether it's the cops or the protesters who tickle your brain's sense of wrongness and transgression
1 reply 4 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Hari_Narayan_SK and
Which means if your project is to actually change the world - to change how people actually behave - you don't do it via arguments and rationality Any position you were reasoned into can be reasoned out of
1 reply 5 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Hari_Narayan_SK and
The human brain is very good at "rationalization", in fact so-called "rationalization" is the primary function and the rationalist ideal of reasoning yourself *out* of your moral commitments, if it ever happens, is a rare accidental side effect
1 reply 3 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Hari_Narayan_SK and
You change what people's morals ACTUALLY are based on changing their emotional landscape Through shame, and fear, and guilt, and desire for community
1 reply 2 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Hari_Narayan_SK and
Again, Frederick Douglasspic.twitter.com/OPPisk7Z8R
1 reply 6 retweets 11 likes
Bluntly, when you say you don't want "cancel culture gone too far" to "ruin someone's life over their honest opinion" you're saying you want there to be no mechanism by which that opinion could ever actually change
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @Hari_Narayan_SK and
IF it was in reference to say the Iraq war debate (Phil Donohue cancelled didn't generate many "Letters") OR anti-austerity voices after the financial crash, then it would be legit. We haven't had honest debates about trickle down econ, for example.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.