They shouldn't, they should trust me to give a correct one, based on my kneejerk sense of disgust, which is correct
-
-
(Emotivism is correct, motherfuckers)
-
I would say that to lack a moral sense of disgust is pathetic - to look at a fucking Nazi and say "Well I disagree but I don't HATE him" Nietzsche's "men without chests" But I don't actually believe men without chests are a thing, I just think you're lying and/or confused
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is how homophobes and transphobes justify themselves though. LGBT supporters may have started out feeling uneasy around gay and trans people, but changed those feelings. Disgust can inform morality, but in a lot of cases the reverse is better.
-
I'm not saying emotion "informs" morality, I'm saying it IS morality, that the two things are equivalent and people deny this fact What you are disgusted by - or angered by, or afraid of - IS what your morality is, whether or not you consciously admit it
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
The degree to which the Allies didn't actually care about stopping genocide until the Nazis messed with the Allies strategic interest is rather terrifying and shaming.