I know they say not to read the comments but if you want to honestly evaluate what kind of community Scott fosters, read the comments The big debate that takes place under this article mostly consists of the pro-Trump half of his commenters just getting more radicalized
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @PlzBeSensible and
"Scott understands the threat but he's too nice and sheltered and doesn't see the true level of danger" It's a constant refrain with him (because he is in fact absurdly narcissistically terrified of SJWs and surrounds himself with people to validate that fear)
1 reply 1 retweet 18 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @iridienne and
I don't understand this tweet, can you clarify
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PlzBeSensible @iridienne and
Almost everything about Slatestarcodex is based on a dislike and fear of "woke culture cancel mobs" That's the one cultural commonality they all have despite claiming to be "politically diverse" Back in the day it was even more specific, they specifically despised Gawker Media
3 replies 1 retweet 19 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @PlzBeSensible and
That's their guiding ethos It's not a secret at all The one political "side" that's always missing from their "diverse" conclave is the "SJWs", people who participate in Black Lives Matter protests and actively support deplatforming and think
#MeToo
hasn't gone far enough2 replies 1 retweet 26 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @PlzBeSensible and
What Scott likes to do is attract people to his little salon who are *even more paranoid* about "the wokes" than he is so he can take the position of the moderate, so he can feel like the sane and reasonable one It's really fucking transparent
1 reply 2 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @PlzBeSensible and
So he can say to an audience of frothing, raving white supremacists "Your concerns are valid but you're just mistaken about how best to address them" and feel like the most reasonable person in the room
2 replies 1 retweet 22 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @iridienne and
An audience of "frothing, raving white supremacists" who, long before George Floyd, believed that the best use of your charitable money was to give it directly to impoverished Africans
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PlzBeSensible @iridienne and
Ah, I was wondering when our good friends the poor malaria-plagued Africans would make their first appearance
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @iridienne and
You just dehumanize people left and right don't you
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Scott did a post on "mistake vs conflict theorists", remember that shit Well I was a conflict theorist in the womb The moment my mom gave birth to me I turned around and wondered what her agenda for doing so was and whether it was a threat to my interests
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @PlzBeSensible and
Aster, internet archaeologist Retweeted Aster, internet archaeologist
Ahaha relevant tweet https://twitter.com/notscottsiskind/status/1276323712950767616?s=21 …https://twitter.com/ArsonAtDennys/status/1276323712950767616 …
Aster, internet archaeologist added,
Aster, internet archaeologist @ArsonAtDennysWe must ask the hard to ask questions. This is exactly the problem with “conflict theorists” (a name I made up for people who were unwilling to debate me about race science). Why can’t we discuss whether Africans are less intelligent in good faith?#slatestarcodex /satire https://twitter.com/evopsychgoogle/status/1275914181577826305 …Show this thread0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.