Probably. Do you want a quote on my hourly rate for research assistance? I'll warn you, as a PhD with a profitable writing career that I'd be distracting myself from, I'm not cheap.
-
-
And again, it's less a takedown than "well I don't agree with them entirely."
-
It's particularly notable to me that when he wrote a piece that's overtly anti-NRx, he focuses entirely on a gish gallop of minor claims instead of paying any attention to the whole.https://web.archive.org/web/20200426174239/https://slatestarcodex.com/2013/10/20/the-anti-reactionary-faq/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's not how a normal person handles wackjob Nazis obsessed with how democracy is a failure and we should reinstitute ethnostates based on the divine right of kings The correct response to that is "You're a creep and I'm blocking you"
-
Scott's "Anti-Neoreactionary FAQ" does the worst thing you can do with people like this It gives them what they crave most - it *takes them seriously*pic.twitter.com/JbjbD6J8in
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
specifically with Michael Anissimov, who supplied all the points he refutes - another of the LW rationalists, and formerly of MIRI
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.