I just don't know that "These people aren't even X" instead of "These people are bad examples of X who give X a bad name" is a useful way to argue Like the former seems to much more readily turn into an academic debate where once you say it you don't have to do anythinghttps://twitter.com/9BillionTigers/status/1272279357340348416 …
-
-
So, like, the seemingly sweeping claim "TERFism is the intellectual wing of transphobia, 'TERF' is to 'transphobe' as 'eugenicist' is to 'racist'" seems justified to me It wasn't always like that and doesn't have to be that way but that's the situation on the ground
-
It's the sheer blatant fuckery of Catholics who two years ago clearly were saying lesbianism was a grave sin and a sign of moral degeneracy now openly borrowing talking points like "AGPs are het men using transition as a ploy to colonize lesbian spaces"
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah - what's less clear is if it works in the United States except at the very fringes, like the Michigan Womyn's Music Festival or whatever. Betsy DeVos isn't part of that at all.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My knowledge of UK feminism is almost entirely based on the song "Sister Suffragette" from Mary Poppins.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.