While I'm thinking about art and commerce shit and about customers generally being shitty - One thing that really gets me about customer "sticker shock" is that people get genuinely shook when something obscure and unpopular costs more than a household name
-
-
That's the price *floor* for live theatre, that's what you pay for a show that's only trying to recoup its expenses for rent and materials and a couple of full-time office employees, with all the talent being volunteers
Show this thread -
Live theatre that's actually run like a business where the actors are being paid something approximating a decent wage for their labor starts in the $50-100 range and goes up rapidly from there I'm sorry, but that's how much it actually costs
Show this thread -
The price can go down if you go to a very popular show in a big auditorium But since live theatre is not a movie and the labor cost of actually doing the show cannot be infinitely reproduced over thousands of screening rooms it cannot go below that $20 floor
Show this thread -
For most people who are used to watching movies this is just emotional sticker shock and they get over it For some people this really bothers them on a fundamental level Being upset that there are prices you can't drive toward zero is what they call "Baumol's cost disease"
Show this thread -
I really fucking hate that it's called that but Baumol was an economist and economists tend to be assholes so It's this complaint about "Why are there so many things where the price keeps on going up but the job they're doing is the same?"
Show this thread -
And the specific example he used was, in fact, live performers, specifically a string quartet "The concept of a string quartet hasn't fundamentally changed in 100 years If they were engineers or programmers, they would've had to innovate in that time or be left behind"
Show this thread -
"Instead, violinists keep on doing the same thing and their salary just keeps up with inflation and the rising standard of living Why is this" Well, obviously, because there is no magic way to make playing a violin more "efficient"
Show this thread -
It will always take the same large number of hours out of a human being's limited time on Earth to practice the violin enough to be good at it It will always require the same amount of time and effort to rehearse for a concert and actually perform it
Show this thread -
Which means that, yes, violinists' wages have to "keep up" with wages in the rest of society if you want there to still be violinists It's not even about what violinists "need to survive", it's about opportunity costs
Show this thread -
If being a mediocre software engineer pays 100x better than being a world-class violinist then no matter how much you love playing the violin a fuckton of violinists will just quit and become software engineers and the orchestras will all just have to shut down
Show this thread -
There IS tremendous downward pressure on live performers' compensation, especially now that these days they are competing hard with recorded media as a substitute (and the price of recorded media has tremendous downward pressure from piracy)
Show this thread -
But the "cost disease" cannot be defeated Whatever "a decent wage" is for an average person in the society you live in - the highest wage you can expect to make for something that takes as much effort as becoming a violinist - *that's how much a violinist costs*
Show this thread -
You will never actually succeed at pushing the price of a string quartet down to the price of hiring someone to stock shelves at Wal-Mart Because if I wanted to do a job for those wages I'd do one that doesn't require learning to play the violin
Show this thread -
You can never drive the price of creative fields like this down to the low low levels you hunger for, you can't make a "string quartet sweatshop" with slave labor in China and sell concert tickets for $0.05 on Amazon All you can do is kill the creative field entirely
Show this thread -
And when you realize asshole economists really think of Baumol's cost disease as a *disease* - "WHY can't we drive these prices down lower through competition?" - and that plenty of asshole laymen unconsciously share this opinion even if they can't name it, it all makes sense
Show this thread -
The dickhead libertarian "exchange theory of value" as opposed to the Marxist "labor theory of value" The idea that price reflects nothing at all other than how much value it gives the customer, and bringing the worker's actual needs into the picture is "coddling" them
Show this thread -
"Your indie movie was only 50% as entertaining to me as a huge big budget Marvel movie so I should only have to pay 50% as much to rent it" "Prices for Broadway shows are out of control, live theatre is entertaining but not THAT much more entertaining than movies"
Show this thread -
"Why should I have to pay a full $15 for this indie game? It's barely half an hour of content If you're going to charge 25% of the sticker price of Doom Eternal then I deserve 25% of the total entertainment value of a AAA game"
Show this thread -
People in this piracy discourse turn into shitty libertarians real fast "Why do you think you deserve to make a living wage for your shitty books no one likes Do you think people with real jobs should *subsidize* you, like Marie Antoinette?"
Show this thread -
Yeah, actually, I do Baumol's cost "disease" just means we're not all in the position of sweatshop laborers That we deserve and can demand to get paid more the bare minimum - or nothing at all - just for turning in mediocre work
Show this thread -
All the assholes on forexposure_txt are trying to fight Baumol's cost disease "I don't think you should get paid just for working I think you should release your work for free and then *maybe* people can *decide* to pay you for your work, if it's *good*"
Show this thread -
And because some people really do love their art that much, people make the economically irrational choice to do so, and by so doing largely ruin their lives
Show this thread -
"So you're saying that in your ideal world people would all pay additional taxes and then those taxes should go to a salary for any rando who posts smut on AO3" Well I think all the randos should all get a salary for doing nothing (UBI) but that's beside the point
Show this thread -
But yes I genuinely do think moving the needle in the direction of that strawman is necessary The "participation threshold" for getting paid as a producer and having to open your wallet as a consumer should be much lower
Show this thread -
Like I was talking about earlier, the world of the 90s where buying a bunch of albums you turned out not to like or buying tickets to a lot of movies you turned out not to like was the "tax" you paid for being someone generally "into" music or "into" movies
Show this thread -
It's the moral thing to do, just like it's the moral thing to always tip your waiter the suggested amount, even if your waiter really sucks You're defending the "cost disease", the price floor - the really bad waiters still have to make money so the profession still exists
Show this thread -
Creative fields, especially, follow a power law distribution The works that genuinely become classics that nearly everyone agrees are great are very rare They only exist because of a general artistic community that "subsidizes" art existing in general until someone breaks out
Show this thread -
If you bristle at the idea that your money keeps getting spent on "regret" purchases that you didn't think were really worth it, remember the "mid-tier" games and music and movies you love were paid for mostly by people who didn't love them and just wanted to try them out
Show this thread -
Yes, everyone is broke right now - although that's us ALL being in the same boat, ALL of our wage floors being attacked as a "disease" ("Why should cab drivers' wages get propped up when anyone can drive a car? Why should hotel staff have jobs when anyone can have guests?")
Show this thread -
There's a lot of strategic errors that have been made in this tug-of-war, red CD prices in the 90s probably really were too high, ebooks could've tried harder to compete on perceived quality to justify the price point rather than the Big 6 just trying to kill them completely
Show this thread - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.