Yeah I'm really not a dogmatist on this and I've come to dislike the other side of this debate because I think that's where most of the zealots are My take is basically "If there's an active conflict of interest the person who actually made the thing takes priority"https://twitter.com/MikeSchnier/status/1271887263455154176 …
-
-
"And this is a new protocol that libraries across the country are using because it's an expression of fair use" Which it was, because a lot of libraries hate paying for ebook licenses, which is why publishers were getting so upset
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I get that, it just means that what they're doing is fundamentally dishonest in ways that I don't think jibe with an information-freedom paradigm. They're trying to score a political win (and they're failing because they're bad at politics) instead of making the argument.
-
I dunno I do in fact see their side of the issue, even though I disagree with it (and kind of kneejerk disagree with it, with a convert's zeal and all that)
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.