Yeah I'm really not a dogmatist on this and I've come to dislike the other side of this debate because I think that's where most of the zealots are My take is basically "If there's an active conflict of interest the person who actually made the thing takes priority"https://twitter.com/MikeSchnier/status/1271887263455154176 …
-
-
I have a lot of sympathy for that position but I wish they'd stop lying about it being their position. If you're a free-information zealot just say that, don't pretend you're a "library" that is allowing "emergency lending".
-
Well, that's a necessary part of the play though The strategy is specifically to *not* say "We, the Internet Archive, are breaking the law" It's to say "We've researched this concept of Controlled Digital Lending that we think is how online library collections should work"
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.