Yeah I'm really not a dogmatist on this and I've come to dislike the other side of this debate because I think that's where most of the zealots are My take is basically "If there's an active conflict of interest the person who actually made the thing takes priority"https://twitter.com/MikeSchnier/status/1271887263455154176 …
-
-
It's looking at existing authors and publishers going "You've already made enough money from print sales, your prices for ebooks in libraries are too high and they're hurting people, we're just not gonna pay them and tell other people not to either"
Show this thread -
You can hold that position if you want to Personally, I have come around to thinking it's a dickish principle to live by, and *especially* dickish to *actually say it to people's face* Especially when you're not playing Robin Hood with academic research but creative work
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.