“Our society uses a distributional rule whose practical outcome is designed to land us at a good approximation of justice” “I cheated the distributional rule because doing so didn’t work an intrinsic injustice” “Friendo, that’s nonresponsive to the purpose of the rule.”
-
-
And in aggregate it's not a big deal, whatever, it's price discrimination Most -- but not all -- of the "freeloaders" are people who legit can't afford it, it's the price of doing business Once in a while someone hangs out at the bar all night munching peanuts and water oh well
-
The issue is when they make it into this *moral crusade* and they don't just do it but they actively say everyone should do it, you have a fundamental right to do it, and actively attack the older system as bullshit If there were a "JUST TIP ZERO" social movement
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
the less leakage there is (the more law abiding folks are even when cheating is consequence free) then the more closely the rule schema can approximate fairness If policymakers use that opportunity to make the rules more fair, legitimacy boosts rule following. Virtuous cycle.
-
This is one of the reasons GOP behavior after 9-11 and 2008 was so morally unforgivable. They took real opportunities to make society fairer (sudden spikes of trust caused by crises) and reacted by shattering yhst trust for a chance at narrow partisan gain
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.