That's about as silly as saying Adam Smith was a neoliberal. Neoliberals are the primary ones who advocate for stricter IP laws. It's anarchists and socialists who view such laws as an impediment to creative action and one's labor.
-
-
It's basically a hard problem, not sure if it counts as even NP, but no way I would trust those vehicles. It doesn't solve anything new that we haven't had existing tech for it (buses, trains, etc).
-
Self driving cannot possibly be only NP hard.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
If you're NOT talking about self-driving cars then as long as there are human beings whose job is driving other people around then that's a job that needs to be paid a living wage
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Self-driving. I don’t think it will happen in a Big Bang next year or anything, but pretty clear co’s like Tesla and Waymo will iterate to full autotomy eventually.
-
There's many problems. First is the potential issue of people hacking them (VANETs are a real security nightmare). Second is the fact of liability. God, this is one area of development I refuse to ever get into as a dev. Just a big NOPE from me.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
0
Yet you’re still profitable bc, like office space, fractions of pennies add up