The author guild isn't equivalent to a labor union as they seek LAWS to further their goals to monopolize the right to mere imitation. A labor contract from a trade union doesn't preclude others from laboring without it if they choose to work somewhere else.
-
-
Replying to @ladyattis
This is, in fact, patently untrue and deeply contrary to the basic goal of "horizontal organizing" in an industry And the idea that there's something corrupt about "letting unions write laws and regulations" is a key anti-union talking point
1 reply 1 retweet 24 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
You keep trying to shoehorn the argument with fallacious reasoning. The laws themselves are monopolies and thus should be abolished as well. Wake me up when you admit the State is inherently a monopoly that chains us all together as its property.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ladyattis
Okay, cool But do you recognize that until the glorious dawn in which the state and all laws are abolished occurs, abolishing SOME laws and SOME regulations while leaving other ones intact is, in fact, just giving power to some people while taking it from others
2 replies 3 retweets 40 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ladyattis
Minimum wage laws are, according to the Econ 101 definition of the term, a form of "rent-seeking" Should we go ahead and cave to the people who want to abolish them, satisfied in the knowledge it's a mere stepping stone to abolishing property and the state
2 replies 3 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
*bzzt* Wrong answer Ricardo already got this right centuries ago. Capital takes surplus value and that in itself is rent seeking, minimum wage is a legal attempt to equalize the imbalance along with taxes. But please continue to tell me what I'm suppose to not know, Art.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ladyattis
Ricardo was a piece of shit who thought a general increase in wages for the British working class would be socially undesirable because they would just drink more so I don't know why you're stanning so hard for the dude
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
Attacking his character doesn't refute his theory. Wake me up when you actually refute his theories. Until then, I'm just gonna point and laugh at you.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ladyattis
I don't really disagree with his description of what "rent seeking" is, I just think it's a fine and good and necessary thing for a society to have The question is just who's charging the rents to whom
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ladyattis
Syndicalism is, for the record, the flavor of anarchism I think has the best chance of getting off the ground in the world we live in, for the exact reason its more-radical detractors dislike it ("It's just turning workers' collectives into the new capitalists")
2 replies 1 retweet 11 likes
This isn't because I have any great love for "workerism" or extolling good hearty workers who hit stuff with hammers as being better human beings than the lumpen who don't But people do in fact have the right to organize around controlling the product of their labor
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect
That we can definitely agree on. But IP law as is majoratively benefits corporations. It's gotten to a point that people producing medicines at cost in other markets are forced by treaty/law to cease production even if the patent holder has no interest in said market.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ladyattis
"IP maximalism" vs "IP minimalism" is really a poor way of viewing this topic These are several different laws that get bundled together and there's no inherent reason to treat them all the same Patents for lifesaving meds aren't the same law as copyright for video games
2 replies 1 retweet 13 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.