I would go through JK Rowling's post point by point to argue with it but the thing is I've already been doing that for years None of it is original, it's like a copy/paste TERF form letter
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
There’s no way she wasn’t homophobic 15-20 years ago assuming she isn’t currently. Her anti-trans arguments resemble anti-gay arguments too much.
End of conversation
-
-
-
I’m trying to figure out what the point is. “Being a woman sucks and women these days should have to suffer like I did instead of transitioning to escape it.” ? Is that the logic? It seems pretty misogynistic itself.
-
The logic is, I think, effectively: "[trans activists] are reinforcing that womanhood is defined by a state of victimization-by-men." Which is nonsense, especially since TERFs seem to believe it real hard themselves, for all they claim to be "empowering" their ingroup.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.