I'm not discounting any1 narrative/asking how u know it was stepped on and not thrown. An agency with accountability locally has made one claim, and Arthur Chu has made the other. If you are wrong, not much will happen, if SPD proven wrong, I worry about results. who2believe?
-
-
Oh for fuck's sake they're ALREADY OBVIOUSLY LYING because THEY SAID A CANDLE WAS AN IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE Jesus Christ
2 replies 4 retweets 40 likes -
if I dismissed you for making up a story about a stomped on memorial, in everything else you have & will ever say, you would disagree with me no? also not sure what Jesus has to do with it. I was just trying to learn what took place in my city.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I never said I had firsthand knowledge of anything, I said this is the obvious explanation for what happened
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
earnestly not attempting to be adversarial. my <3 ached to see the types of twitter msgs u received in that docu. I know your a smart guy, can you see how this is the same path that led to SPD making their claims, is similar 2 ur own?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @any1ofthe99 @arthur_affect and
tbf, the stomping story was presented as a statement of fact. All I was doing before i got here, was attempting to learn what took place in my neighborhood last night.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Well you learned that the cops will blatantly lie to your face about explosives
1 reply 1 retweet 17 likes -
cheers m8. I wish I could share how obvious it is that "blatantly lie" is the same path as "explosive devices" , I really hope in the end we can all come
#together.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The cops said this is a photo of an explosive device This is clearly not a photo of an explosive device, this is a photo of a storebought prayer candle What is the "path" by which this comes to take place other than the cops lying
1 reply 8 retweets 23 likes -
your story about 'a candle was stomped from a memorial & then used' is the same type of semantic hyperbolic divisive nonsense. One could argue your statements are less based in truth than the SPD.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
No, one couldn't, unless one were an idiot asshole
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.