I'm not saying it's a stretch to call a candle lit or unlit thrown at me a 'incendiary device' because it could be described that way. Also , no 1 called it a molotov cocktail, and it is violent to throw heavy objects at a fellow man/woman.
-
-
Replying to @any1ofthe99 @fennec_sasha
The tweet didn't say "incendiary", it said "explosive" The Molotov cocktail is a reference to a different tweet where a different set of cops used that term to refer to an ordinary plastic water bottle
2 replies 2 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @fennec_sasha
where did the story of the candle being peaceably used, in memorial, and just used by
@SeattlePD to create a 100% false narrative come from? We agree on the semantic nonsense. Where did this narrative come from?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
From looking at the fact that this is a photo of a candle in a vase that someone stepped on and asking ourselves how that would happen, after discarding the cops' narrative in the post because they are blatant liars
2 replies 1 retweet 14 likes -
I'm not discounting any1 narrative/asking how u know it was stepped on and not thrown. An agency with accountability locally has made one claim, and Arthur Chu has made the other. If you are wrong, not much will happen, if SPD proven wrong, I worry about results. who2believe?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Oh for fuck's sake they're ALREADY OBVIOUSLY LYING because THEY SAID A CANDLE WAS AN IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE Jesus Christ
2 replies 4 retweets 40 likes -
if I dismissed you for making up a story about a stomped on memorial, in everything else you have & will ever say, you would disagree with me no? also not sure what Jesus has to do with it. I was just trying to learn what took place in my city.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I never said I had firsthand knowledge of anything, I said this is the obvious explanation for what happened
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
earnestly not attempting to be adversarial. my <3 ached to see the types of twitter msgs u received in that docu. I know your a smart guy, can you see how this is the same path that led to SPD making their claims, is similar 2 ur own?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
No, it is not Have I done anything remotely similar to showing you a photo of a store bought candle and calling it an explosive? That's not a mistake, that's not jumping to conclusions, that's a lie
2 replies 1 retweet 16 likes
Do you understand that the person who posted that photo is the one who TOOK the photo? They didn't misunderstand what the photo meant, THEY WERE THERE They are saying there were bombs going off injuring officers and the photo they gave you as evidence is a fucking candle
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.