As far as I know, no one in Maya's work situation was actually trans. Just wokes covering their ass in virtue signals again. Would you mind explaining this "existence" thing? What does it even mean?
-
-
Replying to @IAmDeathRay @SquireOfCydonia and
It was a public-facing international company. You don't want a crazed nutjob publicly tweeting when you're running that kind of business. Crazy person.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @WaPoMax @SquireOfCydonia and
Everyone has opinions that are offensive to someone. "Publicy facing company"... feh. Any big corporation could fire any LGBT person for fear of offending China or Saudi Arabia if we foll wed your logic. Careful of the bed you are making.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IAmDeathRay @WaPoMax and
No, because sexuality and gender identity being a protected class does not imply that all "opinions" are protected in the same way, that's what I keep telling you
1 reply 1 retweet 26 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @IAmDeathRay and
"Opinions" being protected - "You can't fire someone because of words that they say" - is fundamentally untenable and nobody really believes it
1 reply 3 retweets 28 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @WaPoMax and
I'm glad you are such an outspoken opponent of the freedom of speech.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IAmDeathRay @WaPoMax and
I am, because this version of it is untenable and meaningless If you really think everyone should be guaranteed to have whatever job they want regardless of their behavior the fight starts at a much deeper level than Maya fucking Forstadter
2 replies 1 retweet 23 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @WaPoMax and
I'm sure you would like to avoid what Maya ACTUALLY said by resorting to a "deeper" level, because her tweets of evil were actually so anodyne and you could never justify terminating her or calling her an "enemy of democracy" because of them.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IAmDeathRay @WaPoMax and
If I'm her boss I can terminate her for any reason I want
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @WaPoMax and
Now THAT is a liberal talking. I am grateful that you aren't sugar-coating your opinions.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Lol, I mean that's the "neoliberal" way to frame it based on what the law actually says For the record I'm in favor of any action taken to restrict employers from exercising their legal right to fire trans people in places where that right exists
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @IAmDeathRay and
And if Forstadter actually did live somewhere where she had the legally protected right to publicly express transphobia but keep her position I'd support any efforts to make that position as uncomfortable as possible Bigots shouldn't sleep easy at night
0 replies 1 retweet 11 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.