Someday I'll post in full my semi-trolling take that animation should have made all live-action film obsolete decades ago, in much the same way that cinema should have made live theatre obsolete https://twitter.com/loudmouthjulia/status/1264781496688226306 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
Or, at least, you can have animation as one end of the spectrum and live theatre as the other end but live-action film is an awkward hybrid of the two media that should not exist (With nonsense like the "live-action" Lion King remake I even kind of actually believe this)
5 replies 1 retweet 24 likesShow this thread -
Or I could give my other, reverse take, which is that it's perverse that we still think live-action cinema is worth anything in an age of increasingly sophisticated animation and yet fumetti (photocomics) are still such an obscure medium compared to drawn comics
2 replies 1 retweet 15 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @arthur_affect
Related: how much CGI can a movie have before it becomes an animation? CGI is by no means a bad thing, but it does raise the question of why "War for the Planet of the Apes" is considered live action but the rotoscoped "A Scanner Darkly" was classed as animated....
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Remember how they had to work in that one flashback showing Smeagol finding the One Ring in LotR so Serkis would be eligible for a Best Supporting nom
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.