...Except the cleaners, themselves, are human beings who have a stake in this matter, whose interests Owen was defending
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @ClasssicalM and
This is such an incredibly disingenuous, shitty framing, the whole "Silence, class traitor!" stance I don't have a cleaner nor do I work as one but I feel pretty fucking strongly about this issue because I don't want the fucking infection rate to rise
2 replies 1 retweet 30 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ClasssicalM and
A pretty large number of people responded to the original thread taking Owen's side BECAUSE they've never employed a cleaner and found people insisting it be considered an essential service extremely offensive A number of them actually were cleaners or former cleaners
1 reply 1 retweet 23 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ClasssicalM and
God what the fuck is this argument "Talking about what bosses should do is hugely alienating for workers, who aren't bosses and therefore give a shit about bosses' decisions, including how bosses treat workers Workers want you to leave bosses alone" Fuck, listen to yourself
1 reply 2 retweets 33 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @halford_rosie and
I'll be generous and suspect you don't get this because class politics works differently in the US. Here we have two middle class leftists debating essentially about the ethics of employing personal servants in their home. Its all about doing this makes them feel.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ClasssicalM @arthur_affect and
As someone from a working class background, I can assure you that for most working class people that just sounds like over privileged people self consciously whinging. And when said people claim to be champions of the workers, it's not a good look.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ClasssicalM @arthur_affect and
Funny , because I saw plenty of people who are working class with plenty to say about this (including myself) because actually putting working class women at risk so people (who are capable of doing the work themselves) can get their toilets scrubbed isn't something we roll our
1 reply 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @suzanalou @ClasssicalM and
eyes over . Because it speaks directly to the heart of who matters in our society and who's labour is off value and the hypocrisy in claiming it's feminist to have a cleaner whilst ignoring the risk to said cleaners (who are more likely to be women) .
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @suzanalou @ClasssicalM and
The idea that it's absolutely fine to ask your cleaner to risk their health whilst you and your family shelter at home is exactly the same sort of crap that gets us Amazon workers urinating in bottles so people can have next day delivery .
1 reply 1 retweet 14 likes -
Replying to @suzanalou @arthur_affect and
The problem with the whole OJ/SD spat is that it definitely comes from a position of bourgeois entitlement. He talks about everyone having more time (not everyone does) and about how great his family were. She talks about how she's finding the housework.
6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
He said IF YOU CAN AFFORD TO HIRE A CLEANER YOU HAVE THE TIME TO CLEAN YOUR HOUSE YOURSELF It is a straightforward statement that the bourgeois are privileged and can absorb the inconvenience of the lockdown All that "bragging" was in response to SD taking issue with this
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @ClasssicalM and
That's the whole fucked thing here, apparently it's only Owen's "side" of the convo that was able to process that people who hire cleaners are a minority of the population They kept reading "Everyone" into his tweet when that word appears nowhere in it
0 replies 1 retweet 14 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.