So we have a massive argument because two prominent bourgeois leftists differ on the ethics of employing a cleaner. An issue that means nothing to the vast majority of the public. There , in a nutshell, is the explanation for the last election result.
-
-
You'll note that I'm criticising both SD and OJ, but you carry on with your childish ad hominem accusations. As you seem incapable of reasonable argument without resorting to insults, I'm out.
-
OJ made a straightforward statement in support of labor rights and left his own feelings completely out of it For you to state that simply taking a pro-labor position somehow makes OJ out of touch but SD's anti-labor position is "reasonable" gives the lie to your whole argument
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Also, the general principle applies beyond just cleaners. If you have regular appointments with people and have the disposable income to continue paying them without actually seeing them and risking their health, you should do it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.