In theory, Kantian theories of public reason are supposed to be non-coercive. But (a) it's not clear that they count as "enforcement" and (b) I haven't seen a plausible formulation of public reason yet.
I think that's kind of my point, rules and norms like that are "enforced" in the sense that bad things happen if you fail to obey them - failure to get where you're going, failure to successfully communicate - but people aren't generally making a deliberate act of "enforcement"
-
-
Like it's an important thing in our society that if there's a head-on collision whoever was driving the wrong way is legally at fault But that's not really the main reason not to drive the wrong way, the main reason is to not get in an accident at all
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.