It cuts both ways - the bigger a household is the more sustainably they can isolate, but as soon as that isolation is compromised you've infected a lot more people at once Sweden thought they could pull off "controlled burn" because they have such a high % of people living alonehttps://twitter.com/solarpunk_girl/status/1261196542519672834 …
-
-
Like bluntly if nobody at all was married and nobody had a family and nobody had kids and every single person lived alone in their own sealed off apartment Regardless of whether this would be desirable or sustainable long-term In the short term it would slow infection immensely
Show this thread -
The real issue is we don't have true centralized quarantine for positive cases Like there's no way the whole population could live like this but if you could put *everyone who is currently infected* in a room by themselves for long enough the virus would just be gone
Show this thread -
But, you know, you have to know who's infected to do that There's our whole problem
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.