It cuts both ways - the bigger a household is the more sustainably they can isolate, but as soon as that isolation is compromised you've infected a lot more people at once Sweden thought they could pull off "controlled burn" because they have such a high % of people living alonehttps://twitter.com/solarpunk_girl/status/1261196542519672834 …
-
-
But look if we actually all moved back into big family houses right now, a bunch of people who are currently infected would instantly infect everyone living with them right The infection rate would jump upward massively overnight
Show this thread -
That's why they actually said not to do that, that if you have the opportunity to move out of your apartment into a big group home right now you must not do so if at all possible
Show this thread -
That's the whole thing about arguing about the virus The logic of contagion mandates antisocial behavior The virus makes many things that were otherwise good, bad You can't just convenient argue "Anything that would make life better would also help fight the virus"
Show this thread -
Like bluntly if nobody at all was married and nobody had a family and nobody had kids and every single person lived alone in their own sealed off apartment Regardless of whether this would be desirable or sustainable long-term In the short term it would slow infection immensely
Show this thread -
The real issue is we don't have true centralized quarantine for positive cases Like there's no way the whole population could live like this but if you could put *everyone who is currently infected* in a room by themselves for long enough the virus would just be gone
Show this thread -
But, you know, you have to know who's infected to do that There's our whole problem
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.