"Wearing the mask literally activates your own virus. You’re getting sick from your own reactivated coronavirus expressions, and if it happens to be SARS-CoV-2, then you’ve got a big problem." 12/
No, because the book doesn't constitute independent evidence, the book is just a collection of her claims, and if I can tell she's a liar just by fact checking the claims she made outside the book why wouldn't the book just be more lies
-
-
There could be truths in there also (not saying there are, but it's happened before) The article in the OP has lies in it (saying "there's no evidence" when they mean they don't know of any), should we dismiss the rest of it's claims because of those? Obviously not
-
Point taken re: colloquial use However I think my point still stands: science and scholarship demands more precision with language than propaganda. To eschew that precision is to signal to your reader you're more engaged with the latter than the formerhttps://twitter.com/arthur_affect/status/1259729275868950528?s=19 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.