"[Her] blockbuster article in Science... sent shock waves through the scientific community... revealed the use of animal/human fetal tissues was unleashing plagues of chronic diseases." "The paper ... only claimed to show a link between one condition and a mouse retrovirus" 5/
-
-
That's very true, which is why it's complicated Because it's also said when there is evidence being ignored or dismissed They would have a stronger case for "there's no evidence" if they had read her book, which they admit they haven't (disclaimer: I haven't either)
-
Actually, I'd modify that: "there's no evidence" is what people say when they're overreaching trying to make a negative case, precisely for reasons you stated (can't prove a negative) "We're unaware of any evidence" is the objective way to word it that avoids the overreach
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.