A fun fact about Monopoly is it was originally invented by a woman as a game about the evils of landlords and bloodthirsty capitalism. Her idea was stolen by a dude who got ludicrously rich by selling it to the Parker Brothers and taking credit for the idea 


-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @DanaSchwartzzz
"The article published spoke to the fact that Magie probably spent more money making her game, than she received in earnings, especially with the lack of credit she received after Monopoly was created."


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lizzie_Magie …1 reply 8 retweets 165 likes -
Replying to @zachsilberberg
she got $500 for the copyright I think????? which is probably what the "consultant" who came up with ms. monopoly charges an hour
1 reply 3 retweets 145 likes -
Replying to @DanaSchwartzzz @zachsilberberg
But that's her fault for not holding out for more. That's not them stealing, by the letter of the law. Sounds like a woman who was over her head in patent law
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
I mean, they tricked her They made her think they were going to sell her game and give her royalties for it, but they didn't, they did it as legal cover so they could sell Charles Darrow's knockoff (because they'd already made a deal with him)
4 replies 4 retweets 93 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @UnitedWhofans and
If she'd had the money to hire her own army of lawyers she could've sued them over that because it was a contract in blatant bad faith Getting away with it because the other person can't fight doesn't make you right
1 reply 6 retweets 64 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @UnitedWhofans and
I hate this view of the law people have where being able to get away with it means what you did was objectively legal and no one should whine or complain about it anymore Is OJ objectively innocent
1 reply 3 retweets 62 likes -
The only reason I object to it in this case is because she had the opportunity. I look at a guy like James Garner who was in litigation for YEARS with WB and Universal and lost a ton of money with lawyers. But he kept to it. If you believe in something strongly, go for it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Again it's because she was tricked She thought that deal *was* her big break because they told her they were gonna sell her game and pay her royalties She didn't hold out for that much of an upfront fee because that game was her baby and she just wanted to see it succeed
2 replies 1 retweet 38 likes -
That may be true. And it's sad. But that's the business world. Especially the last part. As I look at Shark Tank on CNBC right now lol
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Okay and it sucks Rich people and corporations get away with literally killing people the same way Why do you feel the need to defend it
-
-
To me, I would have asked why Parker Bros would come up to her out of the blue and ask her to buy her game. That would seem suspicious to me. The game had been out there for at least 15 years or so, if I read correctly. IDK it's just I still feel that she could have done more.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
she tried to sell the game to the parker bros years earlier and they turned it down. they only went back to her in order to bury the game in favor of Monopoly.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.