If Harry Potter has a "secret keeper" spell where one person knows your secret location and nobody can ever find you unless they betray you, but they also have an "unbreakable vow" spell where someone dies if they betray you, why would anyone ever use one without the other
-
-
So, if someone was already under Secret Keeper, they could get out of Unbreakable Vows with a shrug and "Sorry, already a Secret Keeper." And every parent would magic their kid as a Secret Keeper at birth, before they understood language, so they could never betray the secret.
-
I feel like *not being able* to take Unbreakable Vows would be a disadvantage in their society, it'd be like not having a credit rating
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.