If Harry Potter has a "secret keeper" spell where one person knows your secret location and nobody can ever find you unless they betray you, but they also have an "unbreakable vow" spell where someone dies if they betray you, why would anyone ever use one without the other
-
-
jenny and arthur chu is a weird crossover event i didn't know i wanted
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In that case they'd better patch that out before all everyone realizes you can get out of an unbreakable vow by becoming a secret keeper
-
I feel like it would just make the new spell fizzle
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
That actually makes a lot of sense if it's one of those cases where magic depends on your emotions. Having a secret keeper functions on trusting another person absolutely to keep you safe. Having someone make an unbreakable vow happens because you don't trust them at all.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ah, they both require concentration?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.