...I've never heard of this and guess I'll have to do some research.
-
-
I think you've turned me around on this
-
I think it's ironic that the Scocca piece came the year before GG because that's when the whole "We the people are coming for you gatekeepers in your ivory towers" thing turned sour real fast
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You only call it "smarm" when you don't believe what's being defended as untouchable actually is untouchable But no one actually just freely says "Joke about whatever you want, nothing's sacred, I can take it" They say they do but they're lying
-
I mean that's where I am as a "humorless SJW" "Oh, you can't take a little attack helicopter meme, you think that's not something to joke about because it's sensitive" Yeah, I do, eat shit
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah, or idk - maybe something like 'smarm' is what snark calls its targets, like the con-men and their 'marks'.
-
uwu might be the defensive version, though.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.