He doesn't -sound- too terrible, but I don't do NPR and never read his stuff. Why is he terrible?
-
-
Replying to @banalexistence
he's part of the New Sincerity writing movement that includes such hacks as Mike Daisey
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Nymphomachy
...I've never heard of this and guess I'll have to do some research.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Nymphomachy
This is probably why I have not encountered this "New Sincerity" stuff. That and my devotion to genre fiction.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @banalexistence
This old essay kind of captures my issues with Sedaris' writing style and the idea of being "anti-irony"https://gawker.com/on-smarm-1476594977 …
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @Nymphomachy @banalexistence
The funny thing is this piece cites David Foster Wallace's cruise essay as a piece of great writing the New Sincerity never could've created but DFW helped *start* that movement with his E Unibus Pluram essay about TV ruining culture
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
I dunno, I don't think the divide he's talking about is nearly as sharp as he claims Every snarky satirist has something they very fervently and earnestly believe in that they'll give you hell for mocking
3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @banalexistence
Every Seth has his showtunes, you might say?
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
I feel like this deserved more recognition
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
It's kind of more like Seth getting all self righteous about atheism
-
-
-
Replying to @Nymphomachy @banalexistence
I just mean that snark and smarm aren't really separate or opposed at all, they always go together Snark is the offensive weapon and smarm the defensive one
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.