That is correct. Also "biological sex" isn't really a coherent category!
-
-
Replying to @iridienne @NathanielHart72 and
IKR—when will people shut up about the so-called large/small gametes & there are only two & nobody produces both. As if your body’s organization around a reproductive role has anything to do with sex!
lmao1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @McgrawFinkle @NathanielHart72 and
My body isn't "organized around" any "reproductive role"; that's teleology and it's stupid and wrong. I don't have a "reproductive role".
2 replies 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @iridienne @McgrawFinkle and
I'm sorry I don't understand what you mean. Please explain I'm not being an ass here. Do you mean you've made a choice to not play a reproductive role or you lack the necessary parts for reproduction?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @TbD92549563 @McgrawFinkle and
I mean that the idea that bodies are "organized for" anything is ridiculous and teleological. Bodies aren't "organized". Evolution has no "goal".
3 replies 0 retweets 15 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Woman4W @iridienne and
Evolution is a series of accidents that regularly produces nonsense traits because it’s not directed or goal-oriented
1 reply 1 retweet 18 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
The mutations causing the genes for the different colors didn't magically appear in that time, that's the whole point, they were always there Mutations spontaneously appearing in direct response to an environmental change (Lamarckian evolution) is impossible
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.