Even the idea that there's an objective definition of "detrimental" and "beneficial" that stays consistent over time is obviously projecting our values onto the uncaring universe
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
There is no "goal", the river doesn't "want" to empty in any particular place And this isn't academic nitpicking because the delusion of telos that underlies eugenics is a very common prejudice that's used to justify real-life discrimination against real-life humans
- Show replies
-
-
-
This thread is a shining example of how Buckminster Fuller was right that nouns were a mistake, tbh. "Evolution" can't have a "goal" because EVOLUTION IS NOT A THING. It's just a name for an iterative process.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.