No, seriously, look it up
Point #1 clearly states: "That Claire Graham, also known as the proven and established operator of the Twitter account @intersexfacts, emits a disagreeable odor"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malta_declaration_(International_Intersex_Forum) …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @intersexfacts and
This says a lot about you, Arthur.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Treecraft_Arb @arthur_affect and
It says a lot about you that you think Intersex Facts speaks for all intersex people. It says a lot that you want to play along with her word games. Then again I know people like you don't want intersex people to be thought of as anything but broken and damaged.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @RadFemme74 @Treecraft_Arb and
When have any of us claimed that
@intersexfacts speaks for all intersex people? Seriously? Intersex people are not a homogeneous group.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zaelefty @RadFemme74 and
*ahem* *deep breath* *checks mirror, adjusts collar* What does point one of the Malta Declaration say, Zach
3 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @zaelefty and
No answer, Zach? It's not a good look for you, is it, ignoring official statements from an intersex org? Ooh, I'd better save screenshots of this for posterity
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @zaelefty and
Yeah okay time's up Zach The first point in the Malta Declaration was to call for the banning of ALL intersex-related medical procedures without the full and free consent of the patientpic.twitter.com/LWHBWANJ3i
1 reply 2 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @zaelefty and
This, by necessity, is a statement against the demand for enforced medical testing and disclosure as gatekeeping for athletics, or gatekeeping for any other activity That's why the Malta declaration moved on to their seventh point
1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @zaelefty and
Which is specifically that the "M" or "F" on legal documentation be wholly optional and changeable based purely on self-ID
2 replies 2 retweets 5 likes
So what, Zach, are you ignorant of or intentionally ignoring an official statement from a broad and organized coalition? Ooh, not a good look, tsk, oof, etc
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.