Holy shit.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @zaelefty @intersexfacts and
Yeah she's pretty clearly making an anti-IGM argument here Zach
2 replies 1 retweet 14 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @zaelefty and
Even in the initial tweet Claire screenshotted you can see she's saying that she's talking about intersex people "with no medical needs", why would she be making a pro-medical intervention argument based on that
3 replies 1 retweet 18 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @intersexfacts @zaelefty and
You really think this is how arguing works, that you catch someone out using a bad word and then you win the argument from that point forward? Christ you're embarrassing
2 replies 1 retweet 19 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @intersexfacts and
Yes, yes she is. There's also her insistence that anyone standing up for a group they are not a member of is speaking for that group. Granted that absence of group membership is assumed, as if someone has to state every group they are a member of.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @intersexfacts @arthur_affect and
You've seen me say countless times that I want any surgery performed on intersex infants, save for the little that is genuinely medically necessary, to be outlawed.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Oh for fuck's sake Claire this is so childish even for you Why don't you take it up with the author of, say, this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/589203
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.