Yet this is inadequate for the purpose of medical care of a child as well as for participation in school sports. The other option would be to suspend the law requiring annual physicals and vax records for children attending school.
-
-
Replying to @LedenUnor @intersexfacts and
Yup Those are the only two possible options Invasive sex verification procedures, or no more vaccines
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @intersexfacts and
Nope - and twisting my comment won’t undo the question I raise. The law can already mandate the need for well-child examination, sport physicals, and vaccination or viable exemption for school participation. Which legal mandates should be suspended ?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @LedenUnor @intersexfacts and
The ones that aren't actually for the well-being of the student, especially when they invade a student's privacy regarding their FUCKING GENITALS
3 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @intersexfacts and
The medical record ALREADY has a sex category. There is no need for a genital examination, as that information is already a matter of medical record.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @LedenUnor @intersexfacts and
The reason the statute includes the reference to "anatomy, endogenous testosterone levels and DNA" is the TERFs being up in arms that trans-friendly physicians have started correctly marking trans patients' gender on their charts
3 replies 2 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @intersexfacts and
Gender isn’t sex. And the AHA has announced that exogenous hormones can steeply increase the risk for a cardiac event. Knowing a student receiving expo genius hormones IS important for matters of health including any risk re: exertion.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @LedenUnor @arthur_affect and
Sorry for not catching the spell-check; if not clear, expo-genius should be exogenous.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LedenUnor @intersexfacts and
This statute has nothing to do with that, and simply mandates biological sex as a binary factor determining whether or not someone is allowed to play a sport on the grounds of fairness
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @intersexfacts and
Yet even knowing the risks of exogenous hormones, as well as the risk of using male developed training protocols for females, do you hold that there is no need for the school or coach to know if a student is being treated with exogenous hormones ?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The coach is not a doctor, and whether the student is in good enough health to play sports is a matter for the doctor to discuss with the student and their legal guardian They get to decide what gets disclosed
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @intersexfacts and
Coaches are not doctors - but disclosure of medical condition is important for the protection of the student. (For ex., knowing a student might need to take a break for medical purposes, or knowing protocols developed for males is damaging for females).
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.