Even if you interpret this to literally mean the note says nothing other than "I evaluated the student under the terms of the statute and determined she was female", those details now become open to discovery if the original challenger continues to challenge the doctor's note
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @intersexfacts and
That's the basic way litigation works, if the law specifically says the doctor has to base the note on certain criteria then if I just don't believe the doctor -- "The doctor's a TRA, they're lying, I know it" -- then I can take them to court and challenge them on those criteria
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes
Replying to @arthur_affect @intersexfacts and
Which is why, in real life, the doctor's note would almost certainly include the doctor's actual reasoning in order to head off such a challenge This is a statute, not a regulation, and the regulations they draw up will probably go into detail about the format
1 reply
1 retweet
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.