And yet in the world as it is, starting one of those is a huge pain in the ass and nobody does it Not even your socialist favs (Jacobin Magazine is a privately owned business, not a co-op, so is Zero Books, so are most of them)
-
-
Is it really that different to say "You can live in my house ONLY if you give me the fruits of your labor and obey my exacting rules" vs "No, you just plain can't come in my house at all, now perish"
-
landlords should be fighting for and advocating for universal basic income. i also think that 25-50% of your rent should be given back to you if you return the apartment exactly how you got it. because it's not like properties depreciate but rent is increased every year
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Right. The problem with wealth is poverty, not wealth per se. And likewise, as I say later on in my threadlet, “property” itself is a coercive concept. It needs to justify itself by reference to the good of everyone, through consequential ethics, or it’s trash
-
If the are vacant residences and homeless people, or homeless people and purposely undeveloped/underdeveloped land that builders want to develop, this is a crime
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.