Conservatives are so used to free-riding on liberals’ self-sacrifice (eg rural white people rioting over Obamacare, which taxed productive urban economies to provide *them* w healthcare subsidies) that a situation where that doesn’t work does not compute https://twitter.com/lawnerdbarak/status/1250599503712923649?s=21 …https://twitter.com/lawnerdbarak/status/1250599503712923649 …
-
-
Replying to @lawnerdbarak @arthur_affect
They see it as “scientists” (who count as per se liberals) say we need to Do Social Distancing. Okay, then if liberals say we need to do SD, liberals should do full-lockdown, and thereby earn our society’s quota of SD, and then the rest of us can live as normal.
1 reply 2 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @lawnerdbarak @arthur_affect
We can’t get sick from church: liberal scientists said we needed to do social distancing and those liberals did social distancing, we’re covered
1 reply 1 retweet 23 likes -
Replying to @lawnerdbarak
Right, exactly, it's not thought of as a need to obey the actual physical laws of nature, it's thought of as a bargain, a negotiation, like you can earn "points" somehow and be allowed a little exposure risk as a treat
1 reply 2 retweets 36 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @lawnerdbarak
Yeah - and to be fair, there's some extent where we do have to figure out the negotiation: do restaurants stay open for take out? Do dry cleaners and laundromats stay open? Etc. But there's a cost for it.
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likes -
And I'm even sympathetic to the idea that religious events are so important, we should be willing to think about what the right balance point is there, not least because of the ways in which it handles people's stress. But not based on "you can't get sick in church"
2 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @mssilverstein @lawnerdbarak
Okay see what I think is really at issue is the belief that the world is in some fundamental way fair and apportions consequences based on moral responsibility This is generally bullshit even at the best of times but the way this particular virus works especially doesn't fit
1 reply 2 retweets 29 likes -
Libertarians LOVE to say shit about "If I take the risk upon myself it's none of your business" But unless you move to an empty island tomorrow by yourself, you CANNOT take the risk of infectious disease upon yourself alone You ALWAYS spread it around to others
5 replies 27 retweets 105 likes -
Unfortunately we do not live in a science fiction universe where we're surrounded by personal force fields and all contact with other people's germs is consensual and voluntary If we did then none of this would be an issue in the first place
1 reply 1 retweet 27 likes -
But everyone saying "I'd rather take some small risk of an earlier death just to live a little again" aren't really bearing the risk themselves They're piling it on others, ESPECIALLY frontline retail employees who have no choice but to interact with them
4 replies 28 retweets 95 likes
The odds are that "relaxed" social distancing with people going out to the beach etc means NONE of the people who actually did it will even get sick, but the rate of retail workers getting sick will spike upwards sharply
-
-
Which will lead to a bunch of elderly people in your neighborhood getting sick from them, and dying, and possibly filling up the ER and killing other little AND YOU WON'T EVEN KNOW IT WAS YOU WHO BROUGHT THE VIRUS IN THE DAY IT STARTED You will NEVER know
2 replies 5 retweets 35 likes -
It's this world of distributed, invisible responsibility that humans are generally bad at dealing with and libertarians are proudly, defiantly, willfully stupid about Stuck in Kohlberg's early stages of moral development, "If I did something wrong, show me the harm"
1 reply 8 retweets 38 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.