From the summary:'If NDC ambitions are not increased immediately and backed up by action,exceeding the 1.5°C goal can no longer be avoided.If the emissions gap is not closed by 2030,it is very plausible that the goal of a well-below 2°C temperature increase is also out of reach.'
-
-
The report nowhere says "human survival" You've been asked to back up the "human survival" part repeatedly with a citation and you haven't
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
There's ample scientific literature on what is likely to happen if we don't manage to keep warming below 1.5 ° over the next decade. None of it describes conditions conducive to human survival.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GwylAnarchaidd @arthur_affect and
Now, you've repeatedly been shown quotes emphasising things that you denied were even part of the report. Were you lying when you made those repeated denials, or had you actually not read the thing?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
No, I haven't, you haven't shown me any quotes about the Earth being stripped of oxygen and the human race dying out even after I directly asked you for one
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @GwylAnarchaidd and
Moreover, you haven't actually linked to the report at all, only to secondary sources describing the report as an urgent call to stay below 1.5 degrees of warming (which it is), but none of which present your apocalyptic reasoning for 1.5 degrees being an absolute cutoff
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
IPCC's summary: If NDC ambitions are not increased immediately and backed up by action, exceeding the 1.5°C goal can no longer be avoided. If the emissions gap is not closed by 2030, it is very plausible that the goal of a well-below 2°C temperature increase is also out of reach.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GwylAnarchaidd @arthur_affect and
'[The report] highlights the urgency of fundamental socio-economic transformation in key sectors such as land use and energy in order to avert dangerous global temperature increase with potentially irreversible impacts.'
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GwylAnarchaidd @arthur_affect and
You denied those things were even mentioned. Do I really have to quote you back to yourself or will you admit that you either hadn't read the thing or were hoping that none of your sycophants had read it?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I did not, I denied that the depletion of atmospheric oxygen and the extinction of the human race were mentioned, because they aren't
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes
Did you not notice that neither of those things are in the quotes you just pasted
-
-
Christ, you climate deniers like to shift the goal posts. There's this stuff called 'scientific literature', and when the report alludes to 'irreversible effects' of not heeding the 'urgency of fundamental socioeconomic transfomration', it's alluding to that literature
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GwylAnarchaidd @arthur_affect and
He's not a denier, he's just pragmatic.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.