Then maybe don't mislead people about the situation. The issue here is that, according to the scientific consensus, there is a minimum level of emissions reduction that absolutely must be attained within about ten years in order to ensure human survival. Biden doesn't come close
-
-
That’s not the scientific consensus. Keeping things to 2C requires drastic action quickly, and going beyond 2C leads to a great deal of suffering. But going beyond 2C does not make the human race extinct.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
If you read the report, you'll see that the idea is to keep it at or below 1.5 °C, because 2°C is disaster.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GwylAnarchaidd @Superninfreak and
From the summary:'If NDC ambitions are not increased immediately and backed up by action,exceeding the 1.5°C goal can no longer be avoided.If the emissions gap is not closed by 2030,it is very plausible that the goal of a well-below 2°C temperature increase is also out of reach.'
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
The report nowhere says "human survival" You've been asked to back up the "human survival" part repeatedly with a citation and you haven't
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
There's ample scientific literature on what is likely to happen if we don't manage to keep warming below 1.5 ° over the next decade. None of it describes conditions conducive to human survival.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GwylAnarchaidd @arthur_affect and
Now, you've repeatedly been shown quotes emphasising things that you denied were even part of the report. Were you lying when you made those repeated denials, or had you actually not read the thing?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
No, I haven't, you haven't shown me any quotes about the Earth being stripped of oxygen and the human race dying out even after I directly asked you for one
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @GwylAnarchaidd and
Moreover, you haven't actually linked to the report at all, only to secondary sources describing the report as an urgent call to stay below 1.5 degrees of warming (which it is), but none of which present your apocalyptic reasoning for 1.5 degrees being an absolute cutoff
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
IPCC's summary: If NDC ambitions are not increased immediately and backed up by action, exceeding the 1.5°C goal can no longer be avoided. If the emissions gap is not closed by 2030, it is very plausible that the goal of a well-below 2°C temperature increase is also out of reach.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, and 2 degrees of warming are associated with sudden sea level rise and a rapid increase in extreme weather events Not with the oxygen vanishing from the atmosphere and the whole human race dying out
-
-
Yes, if it were just those two things, it would only be killing people Biden's going to find a way to kill anyway.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GwylAnarchaidd @arthur_affect and
Wow I never knew before that Biden himself is a natural force of destruction like multiple decades' worth of tornadoes, tsunamis, blizzards, flash floods and wildfires all rolled into one. No WONDER you're against the only running democrat.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.