Then maybe don't mislead people about the situation. The issue here is that, according to the scientific consensus, there is a minimum level of emissions reduction that absolutely must be attained within about ten years in order to ensure human survival. Biden doesn't come close
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
That’s not the scientific consensus. Keeping things to 2C requires drastic action quickly, and going beyond 2C leads to a great deal of suffering. But going beyond 2C does not make the human race extinct.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
If you read the report, you'll see that the idea is to keep it at or below 1.5 °C, because 2°C is disaster.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GwylAnarchaidd @Superninfreak and
From the summary:'If NDC ambitions are not increased immediately and backed up by action,exceeding the 1.5°C goal can no longer be avoided.If the emissions gap is not closed by 2030,it is very plausible that the goal of a well-below 2°C temperature increase is also out of reach.'
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
The report nowhere says "human survival" You've been asked to back up the "human survival" part repeatedly with a citation and you haven't
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
There's ample scientific literature on what is likely to happen if we don't manage to keep warming below 1.5 ° over the next decade. None of it describes conditions conducive to human survival.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Okay so now you're reversing yourself from saying that it said we would all suffocate from the atmosphere being deoxygenated, which it doesn't say
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
No, that's discussed amply in the scientific literature to which the report alludes and with which the intended reader of the report is already quite familiar.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
No, it isn't
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.