Then maybe don't mislead people about the situation. The issue here is that, according to the scientific consensus, there is a minimum level of emissions reduction that absolutely must be attained within about ten years in order to ensure human survival. Biden doesn't come close
-
-
The summary is online if you want to look at it It's literally incrementalism - "Here's one scenario that's bad and here's one that's worse, with concrete reasons that it's worse" https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/spm/ …
-
Perhaps you might remind us, since you totally read the report and would never think of conveniently forgetting certain bits, what the report says if we follow the Biden-Trump plan, which actually has us meeting tipping points EARLY
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I even read the bits you find it inconvenient to remember. They were amply reported at the time, but I can see why the régime and its supporters wouldn't want people dwell on the fact that we can literally chose between the preservation of the régime and a habitable planet
-
No, you haven't, because the report nowhere says that "oxygen levels will become incompatible with human survival" and such a statement is wildly irresponsible because it's plainly false
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
'To reach that goal [avoiding a 1.5 °C rise in temperature], it said, CO2 emissions would have to start dropping "well before 2030" and be on a path to fall by about 45 percent by around 2030 (12 years away at that time).'https://insideclimatenews.org/news/27082019/12-years-climate-change-explained-ipcc-science-solutions …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.