Then maybe don't mislead people about the situation. The issue here is that, according to the scientific consensus, there is a minimum level of emissions reduction that absolutely must be attained within about ten years in order to ensure human survival. Biden doesn't come close
-
-
Most responsible advocates have tried to cut down on the messaging that if we don't do X within Y years it's all over, because people who reasonably look at the world and see that that ain't happening become nihilistic defeatists and say we might as well just get high
-
There's nothing responsible about climate denialism.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Sanders didn't even propose to do it. Indeed, the scientific consensus expressed in that report was that a fundamental change in the social and economic system was necessary in order to ensure human survival.
-
And, bluntly, not even making an attempt to do the minimum that is necessary according to a rigorous scientific consensus in order to ensure continued human survival in the medium term is genocide.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Conquering the world takes longer than 10 years anyway. It'll be like this pandemic: Poor people will die faster/earlier than everyone else for a variety of reasons. We are trying to save as many as we can, not stop a world ending poison atmosphere.
-
Here's the thing. We can say it's impossible to do even the bare minimum because it would require ´long overdue régime change, and then we're DEFINITELY fucked, or we can actually look at what would be involved in doing at least the bare minimum and put our energy towards that
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.