People always try to plead this case as though price discrimination already exists "Do you want to tell some poor kid who has no money they can never watch your movie?" Of course not, but how do I make it free for them without making it free for Scumbag Steve
-
-
Nobody would exist who had a decent job and disposable income but "doesn't pay for music" or "doesn't pay for porn" But they obviously do
Show this thread -
The way people would frame this if they were serious about this being about the poor having a right to enjoy art is that it's price discrimination, it's doing you a favor
Show this thread -
The argument that it SHOULD be free, the NATURAL price for all information is zero, you can't MAKE me pay anything for it even if I'm the richest person in the world is massively destructive All by itself that attitude sabotages the pay-what-you-want price discrimination model
Show this thread -
After all you just gave them moral permission to pay zero It's not me putting it up for free as a favor to the fans, and saying "You have a moral obligation to pay what you can" It's me doing my ETHICAL DUTY to release something that NATURALLY IS FREE
Show this thread -
And turns me from a laborer offering a sliding scale of payment to just a beggar asking you to give me money out of charity So people give less, often a lot less
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.