Therefore, they *do not* statistically represent the 330 MILLION people of the country the way a random sample would. That 25% infected? Is of people who are already considered *likely to be infected*.
-
-
the only way to be sure is to let one earth die and compare it to our safe earth
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
“It’s not the germ, it’s the terrain.” We won’t know for a long time. The rate we’re testing with PCR, and serological tests rolling out next week, this is a whole new world. The shelter-in-place is inexcusable if the data turns out to be wrong. It is creating a mess.
-
So I've gotten lost here: what exactly DO you think is happening?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.