The question "is it reasonable to ask everyone to sacrifice literally their entire waking lives and hide like they're in war bunkers to protect vulnerable people" would never be asked if the vulnerable people weren't more or less evenly distributed through the population
-
-
Which would suck in many ways, but would be the most rational option I mean who benefits from having all of society shut down and nobody doing their jobs anymore
-
That is indeed my question. Who benefits? It seems to me, nobody, financially, so this must be about power. But I repeat myself.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Which is what I’ve been hearing people talk about an 18-month timeline for more often than everyone anyway (Though complete failure to communicate what “underlying conditions” are highkey jinxes that)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This makes sense, but it seems like it could be communicated better.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.