What sex-based rights? Aside from segregated spaces I don't know of any.
-
-
Replying to @sophienotemily @fletcherkathy8 and
Oh, just that minor detail...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @unwitod @fletcherkathy8 and
You can't sell me on "erasure of women's rights" when you're actually talking about one (1) "right"
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @sophienotemily @fletcherkathy8 and
I'll never 'sell' you on anything, as you're so invested in your position. That '1 right' is not really one as the law plays out, but try this as a summary of what women are losing, or would lose, if the current trajectory continues:pic.twitter.com/VeoDwC7HKO
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @unwitod @sophienotemily and
"state enforced sex roles in public education" what!? this is a fantasy of persecution you have constructed to justify your hatred
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @perdricof @unwitod and
Also I'm not sure how "erasing the difference between sexes," which is what seems to have happened in this hypothetical dystopia, would lead to any "state-enforced sex roles" at all?
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @sophienotemily @perdricof and
"the legal right for girls to protection from state-enforced sex-roles in public education" requires identification of their sex to be able to enforce. Is that hard to understand?
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @unwitod @sophienotemily and
Wait so is your assertion that if the state really was plucking out the "feminine boys" from the class and telling them they had to sit with the girls and also be trained to be housewives and barred from work outside the home, there would be no way to oppose this
3 replies 2 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @unwitod and
Please explain how you reached that conclusion. Try reading it again. At no point is there even a hint of that interpretation.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fletcherkathy8 @unwitod and
Arthur Chu Retweeted
That's literally what you said https://twitter.com/unwitod/status/1240061129893842945?s=19 …
Arthur Chu added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes
You're saying gender based oppression can't be fought against, only SEX based oppression (REAL PHYSICAL SEX)
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @fletcherkathy8 and
The point is, Arthur, that the people doing the oppressing are not so brain addled they do differentiate between male and female children. Like when they oppress girls round the world now and deny them an equal education Replacing sex with gender fucks up protection against this
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @unwitod @fletcherkathy8 and
How? What exactly do you imagine occurring? JFC I see so many deranged fantasies from you people
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.